Kitchen Brigade · Lesson 02 of 10

The Station Chart

Lesson 2 of Kitchen Brigade: a crew without structure is a crowd. The three memory tools you've built since First Kitchen — rules, plans, skills — get promoted into a crew handbook that any cook, human or AI, could walk in and follow.

Last lesson you watched fresh eyes beat self-review, and the temptation now is to hire more cooks immediately. Resist it for one more lesson, because of a thing every real chef knows: a brigade without structure is just a crowded kitchen. More hands making the same mess, faster.

What makes a brigade work isn't the cooks — it's the chart on the wall: who owns which station, what the house rules are, what's cooking tonight. And here's the good news you've earned: you already own every piece of that chart. CLAUDE.md, PLAN.md, skills — you built them across First Kitchen and Dinner Service for a kitchen of one. Today they get promoted to serve a crew — because subagents read the same handbook.

What you'll plate today

A crew-ready handbook: rules any cook must follow, a plan that says who owns what, skills written so a stranger could run them — proven by the strictest test there is: a fresh subagent following them cold.

Ingredients

  • A project you'll use for this whole course — a new kitchen-brigade folder, or your Prep Station kitchen if you cooked that course (it's perfect brigade territory)
  • About 30 minutes

Cook

1. The audit — read your handbook as a stranger

Read this project's CLAUDE.md, plans, and skills as if you were a
brand-new cook on your first shift — no shared history with me.
List every place the handbook ASSUMES context a stranger wouldn't
have: rules that say "the usual way," steps that skip "the obvious
part," names that mean nothing cold. Don't fix — list.

The list stings a little. "Follow my style" — whose style, says the new cook. Handbooks written for a kitchen of one lean on the thousand things you and your agent worked out in conversation. Crews don't have that luxury: a subagent starts cold, every time. What made fresh eyes powerful in Lesson 1 — no shared memory — is exactly what makes vague handbooks fail.

2. The promotion — rewrite for cold readers

Fix every item on the list:

1. CLAUDE.md rules: each one self-contained — a cold reader knows
   exactly what to do without asking. Keep them short; blunt beats
   polite (First Kitchen rule, still law).
2. Skills: each skill must state its INPUTS (what it needs to be
   given), STEPS, and DONE-CONDITION (how the cook knows to stop).
3. Add one new file: STATIONS.md — the chart itself. For this
   project: what stations exist (review, research, build, check),
   and what each station is responsible for. Plain words.

STATIONS.md is the new organ, and it's deliberately boring — a list of jobs and boundaries. Boring is the point. Every multi-agent disaster you'll ever read about is two agents who both thought they owned the same station.

3. The cold-cook test — prove it

Handbooks pass or fail on one test, and you already know its shape from the fire drill:

Send a fresh subagent into this project with ONLY this instruction:
"Read the handbook — CLAUDE.md, STATIONS.md, skills — then run the
[pick one skill] skill on [a real small task]. If anything in the
handbook is unclear or missing, STOP and report what, instead of
improvising."

Show me its output and its complaints, unedited.

The complaints are the grade. A cold cook who finishes the job with zero improvising means your handbook is crew-ready. Complaints mean revision — fix and re-test. (And notice the instruction's last clause: stop instead of improvising. That rule alone prevents half of all crew chaos, and it goes in CLAUDE.md next.)

4. Make stopping a law

Add the crew's first standing law to CLAUDE.md: any cook — you or
a subagent — who hits missing information STOPS and reports, never
improvises around it. And: subagents get their instructions from
the handbook plus their specific order, nothing assumed.

Save point: "the station chart".

When it burns

  • The cold cook improvised anyway — instruction phrasing matters: the stop-clause must be in its orders, not just the handbook. Re-run with the clause verbatim. (Lesson 6 makes this automatic.)
  • Your skills turned into novels during the rewrite — inputs/steps/done-condition is a skeleton, not an essay prompt: "cut each skill to what a competent cold reader needs — one screen max." Fat handbooks get skimmed; skimming is improvising's front door.
  • STATIONS.md feels premature — you only have one agent — correct, and so is a fire drill before a fire. The chart costs ten minutes now; retrofitting structure onto a confused crew costs a weekend. Lessons 4–7 fill these stations fast.
  • The audit found nothing — either your handbook is genuinely excellent (Dinner Service graduates: plausible!) or the auditor was gentle. Re-run the audit with "be harsher — assume the new cook is competent but literal-minded."
  • You did this on your Prep Station kitchen and worry about breaking it — the handbook edits are save-pointed like everything else, and clearer rules make your existing stations safer, not riskier. This is renovation, not demolition.

Order up

□ The stranger-audit list — and every item fixed
□ Skills carry inputs / steps / done-condition
□ STATIONS.md exists: jobs and boundaries, plain words
□ A cold subagent ran a skill with zero improvising (or its complaints got fixed)
□ The stop-don't-improvise law is in CLAUDE.md

Next up — Lesson 03: New Hands. The chart has empty stations. Before hiring specialists, your kitchen gets new capabilities — MCP, chosen the disciplined way: two additions your actual work demands, and a pantry rule that keeps the shelf lean.

Stuck on a step? Question box below — a step that lost you is a hole in the lesson, not in you.

Stuck at a step?

Ask right here — no account needed. If a step lost you, that's a hole in the lesson, not in you: answers get folded back into the text so the next cook sails through.

Hungry for more?

New recipes land in your inbox as they leave the kitchen. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.